Data Surveys on Evidence Use in Latin America and the Caribbean
SUMMA, the Laboratory of Education Research and Innovation for Latin America and the Caribbean, as part of the Knowledge and Innovation Exchange (KIX) program for Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), is conducting two complementary, high-value strategic initiatives with regional impact. These aim to strengthen evidence-informed education policies, representing a unique opportunity for diagnosis and informed action.

Overview
Beginning in January 2026, SUMMA, in collaboration with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Evidence for Education Network (EEN), is conducting two data surveys in the region:
1
SUMMA-OECD Study: The Construction of Education Policies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Actors, Institutional Dynamics, and Evidence Use
2
KIX LAC-EEN Project: Survey of Education Priorities and Evidence Gaps
Survey details
Project 1: SUMMA-OECD study

The Construction of Education Policies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Actors, Institutional Dynamics, and Evidence Use
Objective: To conduct an in-depth analysis of how evidence is used and legitimized in education policy decision-making, and how policy processes influence evidence use.
Format & Duration: A 45-minute guided survey conducted via Zoom.
Outputs: An analytical report and case studies on the dynamics of evidence use.
Collaborators: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): This project deepens and provides new perspectives to the OECD study “Strengthening the Impact of Education Research.”
Advisory Group: The project is guided by a group of education scholars and leaders from Evidence Mobilization Centers who advise on major project decisions. Below are the members of the Advisory Group:

Annette Boaz
(King´s College London)

Tracey Burns
(National Center on Education and the Economy)

Claudia Costin
(Center for Excellence and Innovation in Education Policies)

Florencio Ceballos
(International Development Research Centre)

Ben Ross Schneider
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Emiliana Vegas
(Harvard Graduate School of Education)

Antoni Verger
(Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona)

Joel Warrican
(University of the West Indies)
Project 2: KIX LAC-EEN survey

Survey of Education Priorities and Evidence Gaps
Objective: To map national education policy priorities and their associated main evidence gaps.
Format & Duration: A 20-minute self-administered online survey.
Outputs: A regional report on priorities and gaps, a regional agenda, and country-level access to evidence syntheses and tools for practical application.
Collaborators: Evidence for Education Network (EEN)
What Happens After the Survey?
This survey is the first step in an annual cycle of collaborative work, which will involve:
Analysis of Survey Results: Triangulating findings with official documents and government plans.
Joint Evidence Analysis: Inviting collaboration to analyze available evidence on the identified priorities.
Access to Knowledge Resources: SUMMA will provide access to relevant systematic reviews, evidence syntheses, and toolkits, clarifying what we know, what we don’t know, and where genuine information gaps exist.
Why Participate in Both Initiatives?

The combination of both initiatives offers a panoramic and comprehensive analysis of the region’s education systems.
- The SUMMA-OECD study helps understand the “how”—the ways in which policy decisions are made and how these processes impact evidence use.
- The KIX LAC-EEN process helps identify the “what”—the specific educational policy priorities and where evidence gaps exist for decision-making.
Together, both initiatives will provide a robust diagnostic for informed action at the national and regional levels. This will help direct resources towards areas where data and existing information are insufficient and advance the establishment of regional baselines for identifying education policy priorities and gaps, strengthening institutional capacities, and fostering a culture of evidence use in educational decision-making.























































